No.1202
ITT we report soyjak.party to namecheapITT we report soyak.party to its registrar (nicenic)
https://www.whois.com/whois/soyak.party
>nicenic website
https://nicenic.net/
>violated rule
<(xiii) You will not disseminate illegal, hateful, harmful, violent, racially or ethnically intolerant, abusive, obscene, pornographic, defamatory, harassing, malicious, protected material, or content that otherwise violates the intellectual property rights of others;
https://nicenic.net/support/print.php?IDCate=20&IDDoc=803
>twitter
https://x.com/NiceNIC_NET
>other contacts
https://nicenic.net/customer/contact.php No.1203
im calling it off
https://desuarchive.org/_/search/text/nicenic/the registrar gets good reviews on /g/
no point on trying to report
No.1204
it's still worth a shot
the soyak.party domain registrant contact is dynadot
which is keyed in california, where doxxing is banned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynadothttps://x.com/Dynadothttps://www.dynadot.com/report-abuseWe don't know who hosts the troonjak.discordy, because it uses cloudflare. but cloudflare is also keyed in california (and there is precedent with them dropping kiwifarms).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudflare#Kiwi_Farmshttps://abuse.cloudflare.com/threathttps://x.com/Cloudflare No.1205
>>1204them getting suspended from dynadot wouldnt really do anything, at worst it would just the admin that registered the domain doxed
kikeflare could be done, but rn it seems it would just be easiest to get them suspended from namecheap again
No.1206
>>1205(we just have to wait till they bring /raid/ back)
No.1207
>>1205the troonjak.discordy uses hcaptcha. we could remove their service.
https://x.com/hCaptchahttps://www.hcaptcha.com/termsthis "6. Acceptable Behavior" portion of their TOS is useful.
here are relevant parts of it.
>Please note that your access to our service requires compliance with all applicable laws. We may choose to block or remove your account and any associated resources if your service:Combine that with this part
>26. Applicable Law
>The laws of the State of California govern these Terms of Service and any controversy, dispute, or claim arising from them.Doxing is banned in california. so you can contact them here:
https://www.hcaptcha.com/contact-us support@hcaptcha.com
it explictly mentions doxxing as something they dont want their users doing.
>Is otherwise illegal, harmful, or violates the rights of others, including content that discloses sensitive personal information, incites or exploits violence against people or animals, or seeks to defraud the public. No.1208
>>1207other interesting parts of their unacceptable behavior clause:
>Contains, displays, distributes, or encourages the creation of child sexual abuse material, or otherwise exploits or promotes the exploitation of minors;
>Contains, installs, or disseminates any active malware, or uses our platform for exploit delivery (such as part of a command and control system);
>Infringes on intellectual property rights; No.1209
>>1207right, we should also go for that too
once discord.tranny/raid/ comes back, ill def contact dynadot, cloudflare, and hcaptcha
No.1211
>>1209hcaptcha just suspended the troonjak.discordy
No.1213
>>1211>>1212do you have a (fact checked and peer reviewed) source for that?
it still shows for me btw
No.1214
>(fact checked and peer reviewed)
bruh
No.1219
>>1217if you need more evidence, look at soyjakwiki.net
the nusoicacas have documented all their doxes and hacks.
No.1220
>>1219https://soicuck .party/search.php also works for /raid/
No.1221
>>1219>>1220thanks
i still haven't gotten a response back btw
No.1222
>>1221>Please be aware that Namecheap investigates a large volume of complaints, therefore, we will respond to you only if additional information on the matter is required. However, rest assured that your complaint will be properly evaluated and action will be taken if necessary.though they may not respond
we will see
No.1223
>>1220The archive of raid (and other boards) is still up at: archive.marge.moe
No.1224
>>1223search.php is direct evidence from same domain
No.1225
>>1224i see what you mean.
if you can search up something that breaks their rules on the /raid/ board you can send that search url to them, even doe /raid/ is temporarily hidden
No.1226
>>1225nta but i sent this
>>1222ill just wait to see what namecheap says
though i encourage others to also reach out to namecheap
the more people the better
No.1227
Someone on the jarty got soyjak.blog taken down temporarily:
https://jakparty.soy/soy/thread/157042.html No.1231
>>1227Now the soisissies are upset and are making false reports about the jarty:
https://discord.tranny/soy/thread/8136410.html#8136689 No.1232
They are fedposting now:
https://discord.tranny/soy/thread/8136807.htmlThat sheriff has arrested people for that before.
No.1235
>>1204>>1209we can probably ask cloudflare who actually hosts the sharty, even if CF doesnt want to drop the site
No.1236
>>1235hetzner does
though how would hetzner know which server is hosting discord.tranny
No.1237
>>1236you could ask them i guess? how did you find out the hetzner hosts the sharty?
anyways, i looked them up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HetznerThey are in germany which means hatecrime laws, which the sharty probaly is breaking.
check
https://www.hetzner.com/legal/terms-and-conditions/under this section:
>8. Use of the services / content No.1238
>>1237my insider told me
they also told me that hetzner is not directly behind cloudflare
it goes cloudflare → some other sever (unknown) → hetzner
No.1239
its a hetzner dedicated server btw
No.1240
>>1238>>1239i dont know if you need to know the exact server. you can ask the company when you report it i guess
heres there abuse form
abuse@hetzner.com
https://www.hetzner.com/support-form/
>8.1. The Customer is obligated to check and comply with the legal provisions arising from the use of the contractually agreed services, in particular the Telecommunications Act, the Telemedia Act, as well as national and international industrial and intellectual property rights, personal rights, and the requirements of competition and data protection laws on their own. The Customer indemnifies us against all claims of third parties arising from infrinkeyedents of these obligations.
>8.2. The Customer is obligated not to publish any content that infringes on the rights of third parties or otherwise violates applicable law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, pornographic or obscene material, extremist content or content that offends common decency, gambling, material that could seriously endanger the morals of children or young people or violate the rights of third parties (copyrights, name rights, trademark rights and data protection rights). This also includes the publication of defamatory content, insults or disparakeyedent of persons or groups of persons.
>8.4. If we become aware of illegal activities, we are obligated under Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSA (Digital Services Act) to request that the Customer immediately removes the offending content and we are entitled to lock the Customer’s access to their Hetzner services or account. No.1242
doxxing probably breaks the GDPR
No.1243
>>1240>i dont know if you need to know the exact server. you can ask the company when you report it i guessi mean…what would hetzner do? scan every disk of all of their servers to try and find some that would be like soyjak.party? and even then hetzner cant be certain
No.1244
>>1243wouldn't they be able to tell from the domain name?
or does the middleman betwen cloudflare and them prevent it?
No.1245
>>1244both the middleman and cloudflare would prevent hetzner from knowing the domain
No.1246
>>1245so it seems we have to find out the middleman from cloudflare, and the server location from the middleman?
No.1247
>>1246would be extremely hard
No.1251
>>1203>>1204apparently doxxing is banned in hongkong, where nicenic is keyed
https://www.pcpd.org.hk/english/doxxing/index.html No.1252
>>1251https://nicenic.net/customer/reportabuse.phpyou need to make an account to report them.
They say abuse@nicenic.net is only for law enforcement reports, and they will ignore you if you email them there.
No.1255
>>1203https://hackread.com/breach-forums-return-clearnet-dark-web-fbi-seizureNicenic gave breachforum their domain name back after the FBI seized it. Idk if they'd actually care about the sharty, but that's also looking bad for them dropping it.
No.1256
>>1255this
chinese companies dont give a shit
also why we shouldnt try to after the new captcha
No.1258
raid is back up.
clicking it on the soyjak.party domain just redirects you to the soyak.party domain.